Posted in | News

HSE Publish Consultation Document On How Best To Deal With Societal Risk

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has today, on behalf of Government, published a consultation document, seeking views on how best to deal with societal risk around non-nuclear major hazard sites.

Societal risk in this context is about the number of people, on-site or living or working in the areas around sites, that could be harmed by a single incident occurring at a site.

The risk of major accidents at such sites is very low. But because the risk cannot be completely eliminated, the planning system is used to exercise control over new development around them. HSE’s role in this is to assess the risk levels and, when consulted by planning authorities on planning applications, advise them accordingly.

The Control of Major Accident Hazard Regulations 1999 required the operators of such sites to provide information to HSE about the likely potential effects of a major incident. HSE has used this information to produce initial indications of the level of societal risk around major hazard sites.

A cross-government group was established to consider how this information could be used in relation to the management of major hazard sites and the development of the land around them. The consultation document arises from the work of that group and has been agreed by the Government.

HSE Deputy Chief Executive Justin McCracken said, "Industry and the regulators already work together to ensure that risks are as low as reasonably practicable. The risks to individuals are no higher than they were before and are comparable to those we face in everyday life. However, the public has a right to expect the information arising from the 1999 COMAH Regulations to be used when regulatory decisions are made. The aim is to ensure that societal risk data is used in the management of major hazard sites and by planning authorities when making their decisions. This will enable a balance to be struck between protecting the public on the one hand, and the social and economic growth of the surrounding community and industry on the other."

Mr McCracken went on to say, "Ultimately it is for society as a whole to decide what is an acceptable level of risk around non-nuclear major hazard sites. Modern society has gained much from industrialization, including reliable fuel supplies and a wide range of products we use in everyday life. Society must therefore take a balanced view on how to weigh the risks and benefits of people and major hazard sites co-existing."

"This consultation seeks views from all interested parties, including members of the public. We will take account of responses in our future recommendations to the Government."

The consultation exercise will run until 2 July 2007.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.