Fungal Mycelium Offers Sustainable Alternative to Concrete

In a new study, scientists have developed a living building material using fungal mycelium that can mineralize itself or be mineralized by bacteria, offering a potentially self-healing, sustainable alternative to concrete.

structure of the mushroom mycelium of the terrestrial soil.
Study: Mycelium as a scaffold for biomineralized engineered living materials. Image Credit: luchschenF/Shutterstock.com

A recent study published in Cell Reports Physical Science explores a novel approach to sustainable construction materials. Researchers proposed a bio-based building material derived from the root-like mycelium of the fungus Neurospora crassa (N. crassa), which can be mineralized either by the fungus itself or by the bacterium Sporosarcina pasteurii (S. pasteurii). This engineered living material (ELM) has the potential to self-repair, making it a compelling low-emission alternative to conventional concrete.

Background

ELMs are a growing class of materials that incorporate living cells to enable functions like self-healing, self-assembly, and photosynthesis. Among these, some microbes are capable of microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP), a form of biomineralization that can strengthen structures while operating at lower temperatures and carbon costs than traditional cement production.

However, current biomineralized ELMs face important constraints. Their viability is typically short-lived, often limited to a few days or weeks, and they require highly controlled environments to remain functional. Moreover, existing processes offer limited control over the internal architecture of the material, a critical factor when optimizing mechanical performance or tailoring biological characteristics.

This study addresses both issues by proposing a fungal-based scaffold. The researchers chose non-pathogenic N. crassa for its ability to perform ureolytic MICP. Its mycelium, which forms a dense, root-like network, offers a biologically structured scaffold that can support complex geometries and facilitate mineralization.

Approach

To explore this concept, the team designed three mineralization pathways: one using the fungus alone, another incorporating bacterial mineralization, and a third relying on chemical (abiotic) precipitation.

In the fungal-induced setup, N. crassa was grown in two media types, FICP-malt and FICP-def, to encourage calcium carbonate formation. Over a ten-day period, researchers sampled the liquid medium to monitor dissolved calcium and urea levels. At the end of the cycle, fungal biomass was collected, filtered, and dried for further testing.

To test bacterial mineralization (BICP), fungal scaffolds were first cultured in nutrient broth without calcium or urea, then sterilized. These autoclaved scaffolds were then inoculated with S. pasteurii, allowing the bacterium to initiate mineralization without interference from the fungal metabolism.

For abiotic mineralization (AICP), sterilized mycelium was placed in a calcium chloride solution, followed by sodium bicarbonate. The pH was then raised using sodium hydroxide to chemically induce calcium carbonate precipitation.

Each method was assessed using colorimetric assays to track calcium and urea levels, and acid digestion to measure how much mineral was deposited. Structural and compositional analyses were performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction. To evaluate the material's practical potential, the mineralized scaffolds were also used to fabricate osteon-inspired microstructures—cylindrical forms that mimic natural bone architecture.

Findings

The fungal-only scaffolds mineralized effectively, with both FICP-malt and FICP-def samples losing two to three times more mass during acid digestion than unmineralized controls, indicating substantial mineral deposition. Interestingly, FICP-def scaffolds exhibited 20 % greater mass loss than their FICP-malt counterparts, pointing to more efficient biomineralization, likely driven by higher ureolytic activity or biomass concentration.

In comparison, bacterial mineralization was notably faster and more effective. Within just 24 hours, BICP scaffolds hydrolyzed all dissolved urea and removed nearly 97 % of calcium from solution, far exceeding the performance of the fungal-only systems. For context, planktonic (free-floating) bacteria achieved just 35–39 % removal of these compounds in the same timeframe.

Visual evidence supported these findings. SEM images revealed mineral deposits coating fungal hyphae in the presence of S. pasteurii, while samples lacking calcium showed far less bacterial attachment. These results underscored the effectiveness of bacteria-driven mineralization and the importance of the chemical environment.

Mechanical testing further highlighted performance differences. Nanoindentation revealed that FICP-def scaffolds produced minerals 276 % stiffer than those from the FICP-malt condition. BICP scaffolds delivered even more dramatic improvements—632 % stiffer than FICP-malt and 230 % stiffer than FICP-def. The lower modulus in FICP-malt samples may be due to a softer calcium carbonate phase or organic inclusions during mineral formation.

The osteon-inspired structures created from these scaffolds were structurally distinctive. Both SEM and microcomputed tomography confirmed the presence of concentric mineralized rings. Between sand particles embedded in the scaffold, crushed mineralized mycelium appeared as a less dense filler, showing how the material integrates with granular components.

Conclusion

This study offers compelling evidence that fungal mycelium can serve as a viable scaffold for engineered living materials. Both fungal- and bacteria-based approaches demonstrated strong mineralization potential while maintaining the viability of the living fungal component in the self-mineralizing systems.

Still, there are limitations to address. Co-culturing N. crassa with S. pasteurii wasn’t viable, meaning the fungal scaffold had to be sterilized before bacterial mineralization could proceed. And while the team successfully built structures with intricate internal architecture, their mechanical properties remain a work in progress.

Nonetheless, these early results lay important groundwork for developing sustainable alternatives to traditional building materials. By harnessing the self-organizing properties of fungal mycelium and the mineralizing capabilities of microbes, researchers are edging closer to construction materials that are not only environmentally friendly but also smart, adaptive, and structurally sound.

Journal Reference

Viles, E. et al. (2025). Mycelium as a scaffold for biomineralized engineered living materials. Cell Reports Physical Science6(4). DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102517, https://www.cell.com/cell-reports-physical-science/fulltext/S2666-3864(25)00116-X

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Nidhi Dhull

Written by

Nidhi Dhull

Nidhi Dhull is a freelance scientific writer, editor, and reviewer with a PhD in Physics. Nidhi has an extensive research experience in material sciences. Her research has been mainly focused on biosensing applications of thin films. During her Ph.D., she developed a noninvasive immunosensor for cortisol hormone and a paper-based biosensor for E. coli bacteria. Her works have been published in reputed journals of publishers like Elsevier and Taylor & Francis. She has also made a significant contribution to some pending patents.  

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Dhull, Nidhi. (2025, April 30). Fungal Mycelium Offers Sustainable Alternative to Concrete. AZoBuild. Retrieved on April 30, 2025 from https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23782.

  • MLA

    Dhull, Nidhi. "Fungal Mycelium Offers Sustainable Alternative to Concrete". AZoBuild. 30 April 2025. <https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23782>.

  • Chicago

    Dhull, Nidhi. "Fungal Mycelium Offers Sustainable Alternative to Concrete". AZoBuild. https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23782. (accessed April 30, 2025).

  • Harvard

    Dhull, Nidhi. 2025. Fungal Mycelium Offers Sustainable Alternative to Concrete. AZoBuild, viewed 30 April 2025, https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23782.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.