By Nidhi DhullReviewed by Susha Cheriyedath, M.Sc.Nov 7 2024A recent article published in Sustainability investigated the integration of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) within residential architecture. Their combined potential of BCIs and BIM in fostering neuro-responsive, sustainable environments within Construction 5.0. was explored through real-time BCI data and subjective evaluations of occupants’ experiences.
Study: Construction 5.0 and Sustainable Neuro-Responsive Habitats: Integrating the Brain–Computer Interface and Building Information Modeling in Smart Residential Spaces. Image Credit: Wright Studio/Shutterstock.com
Background
Neuro-responsive environments under Construction 5.0 are intersections of neurology, architectural design, and sustainability. They use innovative technologies to adjust to people’s demands and behaviors dynamically. However, the research on integrating BIM and BCIs into architectural design to facilitate improved human-environment interactions is lacking.
The influence of BCI in enabling in-the-moment modifications in response to occupants’ emotional and cognitive states remains unknown. This makes it challenging to create flexible, user-centered environments that support sustainability. Consequently, matching architectural design to changing environmental and social requirements is difficult.
Construction 5.0’s neuro-responsive settings can address these challenges by combining neurology, ecological sustainability, and architectural design. However, addressing such complex societal and environmental challenges requires collaboration across various disciplines. Therefore, this study explored the synergy between BCI and BIM technologies to address design limitations in realizing sustainable and user-centered environments.
Methods
A survey was conducted to gather the feedback of 130 participants on their experiences and attitudes toward incorporating BCI and BIM technologies in residential environments. The feedback was collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire with five response types, ranging from “1-Strongly Disagree” to “5-Strongly Agree”
The survey instrument underwent multiple validation steps to ensure reliability. Feedback from a pilot phase with a small group of subject-matter experts was used to adjust the instrument for better user-friendliness and focus on critical constructs.
Additionally, Cronbach’s alpha, a statistical parameter, was used to ensure internal consistency in the survey. Through the survey, the concept of Sustainable Neuro-Responsive Environments was introduced and designed to adapt to occupants’ psychological and physiological needs. Environmental factors, such as lighting, temperature, and spatial arrangements, were optimized to enhance comfort and well-being using BCI. Notably, a continuous feedback loop was established to make the BCI-BIM system responsive to the changing needs of inhabitants.
Noninvasive electroencephalographic (EEG) technology was used during data collection to monitor brain activity in real time. Additionally, qualitative methods, including surveys, interviews, and ethnographic studies, were employed to gain deeper insights into residents’ experiences and interactions with the built environment.
Results and Discussion
The survey results indicated a considerable comfort level of the participants in utilizing BCIs to modify their environment. Most participants (72) evaluated their comfort level at a score of 4, probably because BCI transforms people’s interactions with their environments, allowing users to control their surroundings more effortlessly and intuitively. Elements such as lighting and temperature can be customized according to the user preferences.
The survey data highlighted the strong appeal and perceived importance of integrating environmentally friendly technologies in residential properties. Around 48.5% of the participants rated the appeal at level 4, while 28.5% assigned the highest rating of 5.
A broad agreement was observed on the appeal of eco-friendly household technologies, with an average rating of 4.02 and a median of 4. Despite the challenges, like the high initial cost of installing solar panels and energy-efficient systems, this growing acceptance of sustainable methods will contribute to a healthier planet and more resilient communities.
The impact of adaptable living on occupants’ well-being was reflected in the survey data. Over half of the participants (55.4%) rated the impact of such environments on well-being at a level of 4, while 25.4% rated it at the highest level of 5, and the average response score was 4.05. Therefore, the positive effects of adaptable living spaces on improving residents’ quality of life are widely recognized.
Furthermore, the survey results exhibited a strong positive trend toward recognizing the value of BIM-based digital twins. None of the participants strongly disagreed with the importance of the BIM approach, and only 1.5% considered it less significant.
Alternatively, 60% of respondents rated the significance of BIM in improving decision-making for home maintenance as 4, while 28% gave it a maximum score of 5. Notably, the survey achieved a 100% response rate, reflecting thorough engagement from all participants.
Conclusion
Overall, the researchers comprehensively analyzed the attitudes and perceptions toward BCI and BIM technologies in residential settings. The survey results can be vital theoretical contributions and have practical implications for developing sustainable and human-centric living spaces. However, the study has certain limitations. While the BCI-BIM integration is promising for controlled environments, scaling it for larger residential complexes and urban regions remains challenging.
Additionally, the cognitive data obtained through BCI technology may include discrepancies affecting the system’s reliability in adjusting to real-time input. Moreover, such sensitive neurological information raises concerns about data privacy and security. The researchers suggest addressing these limitations through advanced statistical methods to evaluate the BCI-BIM integration across diverse demographics and settings.
Journal Reference
Almusaed, A., Yitmen, I., Almssad, A., & Myhren, J. A. (2024). Construction 5.0 and Sustainable Neuro-Responsive Habitats: Integrating the Brain–Computer Interface and Building Information Modeling in Smart Residential Spaces. Sustainability, 16(21), 9393. DOI: 10.3390/su16219393, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9393
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.